California Workplace Discrimination Laws: A Guide For Employees

Protected Characteristics Under California FEHA

 

Government Code § 12940 prohibits employment discrimination in California on the basis of the following protected characteristics. Each has its own framework, specific defenses, and case law:

​

Race and color. Beyond the specific hairstyle protections of the CROWN Act, race discrimination covers the full spectrum of racial bias in California workplaces. See our deep-dive on California race discrimination beyond the CROWN Act. For hairstyle-specific protections — natural hair, braids, locs, twists — see our guide on the CROWN Act in California.

​

Religion, religious creed, and religious practice. After the U.S. Supreme Court's 2023 decision in Groff v. DeJoy, the undue hardship standard for denying religious accommodation was substantially narrowed. See our guide on California religious discrimination after Groff.

​

National origin, ancestry, and immigration status. California uniquely protects immigration status through both FEHA and the Labor Code. See our guide on California national origin and immigration status discrimination.

​

Sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and pregnancy. California recognizes sex-plus discrimination, gender stereotyping theories, and grants transgender and gender-nonconforming employees full FEHA coverage. See our guide on California sex and gender discrimination beyond pregnancy and sexual orientation. For pregnancy-specific termination, see our guide on pregnancy and missing work in California.

​

Physical or mental disability. California's disability framework is broader than the ADA and imposes independent duties of reasonable accommodation and the interactive process. See our guide on California disability discrimination, accommodation, and the interactive process.

 

Medical condition. California protects cancer survivors, genetic information holders, and employees with specific medical conditions distinct from the general disability category — without requiring proof that the condition limits a major life activity. See our guide on California medical condition discrimination — cancer, genetic information, and FEHA without a disability threshold.

​

Age (40 and over). California's Fair Employment and Housing Act protects employees age 40 and over from discrimination in hiring, promotion, compensation, assignment, discipline, and termination. California age protection is broader than the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act, including coverage for smaller employers and uncapped damages. See our Forbes article on "how age discrimination impacts corporate leaders" and our guide on age discrimination when a California layoff is a pretext for targeting older workers.

​

Marital status. California treats marital status as a protected characteristic independent of sex, covering single, married, divorced, separated, and widowed employees. Adverse action based on an employee's spouse, partner, or marital arrangement — including anti-nepotism policies applied unevenly — can support a FEHA claim. See our guide on whether marital status should affect your job.

 

Military and veteran status. California protects current and former members of the U.S. Armed Forces, National Guard, and Reserves from employment discrimination. Protection extends to adverse action based on service obligations, deployment, or veteran status. The federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) provides additional reinstatement and benefit rights that run parallel to FEHA. 

 

Reproductive health decisionmaking. Added to FEHA in 2022, this protection prohibits employers from discriminating based on an employee's or applicant's reproductive health decisions — including decisions about contraception, fertility treatment, and abortion. California is one of the first states to codify this protection. 

​

Theories of Discrimination in California

 

A California discrimination case can proceed under one or more of three distinct legal theories, each with its own proof requirements:

 

Disparate treatment. The employer intentionally treated an employee differently because of a protected characteristic. This is the most common theory and requires proof of discriminatory motive. See our guide on disparate treatment discrimination under California FEHA.

 

Disparate impact. A facially neutral employer policy or practice disproportionately harms a protected group without business necessity. This theory does not require proof of intent. See our guide on disparate impact discrimination in California.

​

Hostile work environment (harassment as discrimination). Severe or pervasive conduct based on a protected characteristic creates a hostile work environment actionable under FEHA. See our guide on harassment as a form of discrimination and what FEHA § 12940(j) actually covers.

​

For large-scale cases affecting multiple employees or documenting systemic employer conduct, pattern and practice evidence under California FEHA can transform an individual case into a class-wide recovery.

 

How to Prove a California Discrimination Claim

​

California disparate treatment cases proceed under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework modified by the substantial motivating factor causation standard the California Supreme Court adopted in Harris v. City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal-4th 203.

 

The employee establishes a prima facie case, the employer articulates a legitimate non-discriminatory reason, and the employee proves the reason is pretext and that the protected characteristic was a substantial motivating factor.

​

See our step-by-step breakdown of the McDonnell Douglas framework as applied in California FEHA cases.

​

Direct evidence — explicit statements tying the adverse action to the protected characteristic — is rare.

 

Most California cases rely on circumstantial evidence, including written communications, comparator treatment of employees outside the protected class, temporal proximity between a protected disclosure and adverse action, inconsistent application of employer policies, and shifting explanations across the investigation and litigation stages.

​

Filing a Discrimination Claim in California

 

FEHA-based discrimination claims must be filed with the California Civil Rights Department within three years of the most recent discriminatory act. After the CRD issues a right-to-sue notice, the employee has one year to file a civil lawsuit.

​

The CRD complaint itself is free and does not require an attorney. The CRD may investigate, attempt conciliation, or issue a right-to-sue notice without further action — allowing the employee to proceed directly to civil court.

 

For strategically significant cases, most California employment attorneys recommend requesting a right-to-sue immediately rather than waiting for CRD investigation, because civil court provides broader discovery and remedies.

​

Parallel filing with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is available for claims involving federally covered employers (15+ employees for most categories, 20+ for age claims). Federal filing is subject to the much shorter 300-day EEOC deadline.

​

Damages Recoverable Under California FEHA

 

California FEHA provides among the most plaintiff-favorable damages structures in American employment law.

 

Unlike Title VII, FEHA imposes no cap on compensatory or punitive damages, and attorney's fees to prevailing employees are mandatory — meaning the employer pays your legal fees when you win.

​

See our comprehensive breakdown of FEHA damages — what you can actually recover in a California discrimination case, including economic damages (back pay, front pay, benefits), emotional distress damages, punitive damages under Civil Code § 3294, and statutory attorney's fees.